85 comments posted, 2 removed | this article is 98% spam-free |
unlearn27
: yeah because all emo shit uses reverb. that's probably the dumbest thing i've heard. i guess SRV is emo.
but this amp is sweet. my personal fav.POSTED: 07/21/2006 - 03:17 pm / quote |
Stop Messin'
: "My only comlaint is that it doesnt have reverb which is ok bc I dont play and emo shit or magic metal or w/e."
That's the dumbest thing i've ever heard. I guess Chuck Berry is emo also. The person who reviewed this amp doesn't deserve to own it.POSTED: 07/21/2006 - 04:02 pm / quote |
Stop Messin'
: Great amp though. My grandfather has been using Boogies for years and they are the best in my opinion.POSTED: 07/21/2006 - 04:02 pm / quote |
orangeacid
: how much better is this than a dual?POSTED: 07/21/2006 - 04:03 pm / quote |
guitarjared
: Great amp, but definitely a douchebag reviewer.POSTED: 07/21/2006 - 04:24 pm / quote |
jumpmanhat
: i heard that the dual is better, anyway, to the reviewer: you sound stupid! "(unless you have it fully cranked and you are standing two feet away from it) Its been said that the trip rect is a tweeker amp, meaning that maxing everything out will make it sound stupid, and its true. why would you even say that?POSTED: 07/21/2006 - 04:52 pm / quote |
michaelcyborg
: hahahha, so many bands use reverb.
pink floyd uses reverb on some songs.
what an ignorant reviewerPOSTED: 07/21/2006 - 06:40 pm / quote |
Randy_Rhoads4
: the garbage marshall is producing? marshall kix assPOSTED: 07/21/2006 - 09:52 pm / quote |
dyingbreed88
: wait your only complaint is that it doesn;t have a reverb? So you want it, even though you don't play that "emo shit"? Wow...POSTED: 07/21/2006 - 10:13 pm / quote |
Slayer224
: orangeacid wrote:
how much better is this than a dual? |
More or less the same.
The only significant difference would be the wattage. The Dual rectifier would be able to break up at lower volumes than the Triple (which is still f*cken loud).POSTED: 07/21/2006 - 11:55 pm / quote |
Kikuta
: Okay, why is it before my vote the user rating was 6.6? Are people f**cking morons these days or something? This has got to be one of the best bloody amps i've ever played!POSTED: 07/22/2006 - 01:44 am / quote |
stumac8
: Never used a Mesa, never will. Marshall 'Garbage' does the trick for me, and its done the trick for thousands of guitarists including: Hendrix, Page, Kossoff, Angus and Malcom Young etc.
I rest my case. 
ps. The guy who wrote this review is a bit crap.POSTED: 07/22/2006 - 04:22 am / quote |
aidandude
: why would you use a 150 watt tube amp as a practice amp? you cant get a good sond out of theese things unless you crank it. and wtf do you mean reverb is for emos? i should kill your wifePOSTED: 07/22/2006 - 05:08 am / quote |
orangeacid
: Never used a Mesa, never will. Marshall 'Garbage' does the trick for me, and its done the trick for thousands of guitarists including: Hendrix, Page, Kossoff, Angus and Malcom Young etc.
I rest my case. |
Sorry, does that mean you've never tried a Mesa before, and you like your amp because its common, disliking it is a flameable offence, and a number of buzz-names have used it? If so, then you are perhaps as stupid as the reviewer.
If not then hey, fair enuff, recifiers aren't for everyone POSTED: 07/22/2006 - 08:24 am / quote |
FhazE
: I realize this should probably stay strictly to the triple rect. but I have been contemplating getting a new amp and am going for either marshall or mesa... but I have heard that the Mark IV is the ultimate mesa amp... what do you guys think?POSTED: 07/22/2006 - 11:54 am / quote |
m
: Checked.
And leave out the flaming of the review writer.POSTED: 07/22/2006 - 05:00 pm / quote |
kurtshapedbox
: I personally LOVE Mesa, but Marshalls really don't do anything for me. Ive seen/heard of far too many Marshalls break down/ or fu*cking up for me to like em. Plus I really dont care for their sound at all.POSTED: 07/23/2006 - 12:36 am / quote |
GuitarGod610
: I also love Mesa. I own an F-50 head at the moment, but I used to have the Triple Rect. Unfortunately, it was more amp than I needed at that time, but still it was incredible. I'm also not a fan of Marshall. I cannot stand their crunch channels. POSTED: 07/23/2006 - 01:39 am / quote |
ivaacs
: Mesa...Marshall...why does everyone like sounds that have "been done". Try a Rivera Knucklehead or Fandango. Best versatile 3 channel amps that don't compromise clean for a nasty, rip your throat out distortion.
And I understand what he meant by reverb=emo shit. He was referring to modern genres.
Marshall=shit (i've owned DSL,TSL,800,900)inless you sell your testicles and get and old plexi, but at that cost, why wouldn't you buy a Bogner or Soldano?
Mesa=great distortion, shitty clean and popular for crapping out in the middle of a set(always have a backup)
Rivera=Boutique amp at mesa/Marshall prices
Unique "slay a emo/homo" gain with crystal clear fender clean
POSTED: 07/23/2006 - 11:46 am / quote |
KVX10 KING V
: This guy ^^(ivaacs)^^ is a complete idiot.POSTED: 07/23/2006 - 04:26 pm / quote |
ptownbob
: screw the mesas. get a krank. it'll rip peoples heads off.POSTED: 07/23/2006 - 06:07 pm / quote |
selloutpunx
: just because you cannot find a tone you like on an head doesn't make it suck. seriously, the whole "marshall sucks because everyone plays it" thing got old long ago.POSTED: 07/23/2006 - 07:02 pm / quote |
Dyaxe666
: maybe veryone plays it because it's good? anyone think fo that>?POSTED: 07/23/2006 - 11:14 pm / quote |
King ofKumbucha
: aidandude wrote:
why would you use a 150 watt tube amp as a practice amp? you cant get a good sond out of theese things unless you crank it. and wtf do you mean reverb is for emos? i should kill your wife |
LOL indeed you should.POSTED: 07/24/2006 - 05:03 am / quote |
ivaacs
: Name of the game here in the studio is....Find your own f'in sound. Unless all you play is covers, then forget my review all together. POSTED: 07/24/2006 - 08:34 am / quote |
ivaacs
: Kranks are another good unique amp. A+POSTED: 07/24/2006 - 08:35 am / quote |
pigeonkicker
: you guys think this or a marshall 350 mode four is better?
POSTED: 07/31/2006 - 02:10 am / quote |
metalhead88
: ok A) kranks are horrible... tey have thin solid state distortion.... B) Marshalls are ok but have absolutly no cut through but do giv a nice heavy full tone... C) i own a mesa dual rec solo head and have played a tripple rec along with marshalls peavey's soldano's kranks and bogners... the dual rec is one of the heaviest amps by far and the only true difference between the dual and tripple rec is clean headroom... and i repeat thats the only differencePOSTED: 08/05/2006 - 01:02 am / quote |
metalhead88
: ive played marshalls peaveys bogners mesas kranks and i have something to say about all of them... A) kranks are terrible and have really thin sounding solid state distortions... B) marshalls are good but are very contourd and have no cut through. however do give a nice full heavy tone C) i own a mesa dual rec solo head and 4x12 slant cab and it is amazing for hardcore. I do gig with it and no it does not crap out in the middle of a set what so ever. The sound can be a little noisy when cranked but all you gotta do is turn down the gain or output and everything will be back to normal. The only difference between a dual rec and a tripple rec and i repeat the only difference is clean headroom. however i did find that the tripple rec does drain some of your tone compared to the dual rec. d) peaveys are ok aslong as ur working with a 6505 or 5150 which is the exact same amp. but they are very un reliable and unversitle. the fact that you have to change the bias when you change a single tube is rediculous. your amp goes away for like 6 weeks. terrible service. E) bogners are great amps what can i say. but if you want an amp that you will never complaine about i know its pricey but you have to go with a diezel amp. very pricey but you get what you pay for they are absolutly incredable. POSTED: 08/05/2006 - 01:25 am / quote |
richardarichter
: i had one of these amps , i really liked everything about it .it was dark ,the highs were not too high ,it had massive attack and massive low end.it was perfect for death metal.if i would desighn a amp this would be it .POSTED: 08/09/2006 - 03:00 am / quote |
orangeacid
: haaaaa ivaacs, what a moron.
I have done some research, and dual rectifiers do indeed seem the way to go.POSTED: 08/28/2006 - 06:48 am / quote |
cerveza
: pigeonkicker wrote:
you guys think this or a marshall 350 mode four is better?
| this is a lot better, but the dual rec tops this one. mode four is a solid state.
mathematical equation for ya:
solid state=bullshit
tube=lovePOSTED: 10/06/2006 - 12:24 am / quote |
zackprs
: cerveza wrote:
pigeonkicker wrote:
you guys think this or a marshall 350 mode four is better?
this is a lot better, but the dual rec tops this one. mode four is a solid state.
mathematical equation for ya:
solid state=bullshit
tube=love |
+1 the Mark 4 is reaaally reaaally badPOSTED: 11/21/2006 - 08:05 am / quote |
murderproof
: this amp sucks cock...COCK. do not buy it. the new roadster is a much better buy...4 channels 2 clean 2 overdrive and the distortion is Much better than the TR. POSTED: 11/30/2006 - 08:23 am / quote |
murderproof
: | Kranks are another good unique amp. A+ |
you think mesa's sukck but kranks are good? what the F#ck is wrong with you. Kranks are the most generic metal amps ever. even the tubes. Mesas have such a wider variety of sounds and options. go take your "different" crap elsewhere.POSTED: 11/30/2006 - 08:33 am / quote |
defcon224
: cant we all just get along?!?!?!?POSTED: 12/10/2006 - 11:57 am / quote |
DareBear02
: [quoteok A) kranks are horrible... tey have thin solid state distortion.... ][/quote]
Dude, I love metal, I play metal and you can't knock off an Amp that ONLY MAKES TUBES and was USED BY DIME BAG DARRELL, how old are most of you guys? I've played the Tripple Rec and I love it honestly, the only complaint I would have is probably the fact that once any one plays one, it's hard to go back. Also, Mesa is a tweek amp, which means YOU HAVE TO CRANK UP THE VOLUME TO WARM UP THE TUBES!!! I swear to god, what the **** ever happened to metal heads who used to know what good gear is? I bet that half of you guys don't even know how to use any goddamn EQ channels for your amp setup.POSTED: 12/11/2006 - 11:50 am / quote |
axeman84
: the guy that wrote the first review is a complete toolPOSTED: 12/11/2006 - 12:55 pm / quote |
USAPeavey
: Ive heard great things about all these amps mentioned here. I've never actually played a Krank so I can't talk about it, but as to the Mesas...I've never played one I didn't like, at least for the overdrive. The best cleans I've heard came out of a Fender vintage Twin. For Marshalls, I personally don't like the "modern" models such as the JCM series, but the vintage reissues are great. Such as the 1987XL. They are great amps, but I have to say...Damn...how can you people afford these kinda amps? Ill be stretching myself for the $600 Fender Deluxe.POSTED: 12/11/2006 - 01:15 pm / quote |
DirtyNoise
: I own a duel rec and 4x12 straight cab. This is the "sound"
Don't waste your time or money buying anything less.POSTED: 12/11/2006 - 02:36 pm / quote |
KoRnFr33K7
: i own a mesa dual and MY GAD! its a beast. i ve played many amps and there isnt anything that nearly compares to these beasts. BUt yea if your gonna own one, you better know how to use it or else its just a waste. WIth this thing ive seen shot glass jump and break mid air just from the frequency vibrations. the triple is just 50 w more then the mesa dual which is just unneccccessary.POSTED: 12/11/2006 - 04:03 pm / quote |
Striketalonx
: mesa's are cool.
The thing you have to realize when comparing marshalls and mesa's is that they use differnet tube types to attain different sounds.
Also: I've tried various "Kranks" the Krankenstein and the Revolution 1. The Krankenstein is utter shit, it doesn't matter if Dime used it or not, especially considering he used randalls for most of his career and really only switched to Krank on his last album or two, the distortion sounds like a medium quality SS amp, and its cleans are utter shit, and for the same price, there is much much better out there. However, the revolution 1 is a decent amp, worth checking out, but again, its not really worth the price.
onto the Mesa's, honestly I prefer the Mark IV and the Stilleto. The Mark IV is basically a more versatile Dual rectifier, without the cheesey diamond plate grill. The Stilleto uses the same tubes as a typical Marshall (EL34's), but it gets waay heavier than a JCM.
In the end though, the Road King and Triaxis are the flagship models. They both sport both the 6L6 tubes (from the Mark IV and Rectifiers) as well as EL34's from the Stilleto/ "marshalls". So you can cover the most ground, with the most insane tone ever.POSTED: 12/11/2006 - 06:06 pm / quote |
M4jorpiz
: doesnt the amp have reverb knobs on the back?? i havent heard a single emo band that even used reverb and almost every band uses reverbPOSTED: 12/11/2006 - 07:50 pm / quote |
Satans_Shredder
: I Love how he compares a Triple Mesa to a Dual Marshall...thats like apples to oranges, wwhat a jackass. I guess thats cause the Marshall TSL blows the Mesa Triple outta the waterPOSTED: 12/11/2006 - 08:43 pm / quote |
danv2916
: try out a VOX Valvetronix! Its an amazing amp practice wise
POSTED: 12/11/2006 - 09:12 pm / quote |
voodooblues
: mesa boogie makes amazing amps no doubt, but they definately have a buyer in mind when they make it, its a metal and rock amp, unlike the marshall dual super lead. marshall has been known to do nothing but rock, but this is due to the fact that either everyone wants to be Hendrix or that they're so damn loud. Marshall makes the most versitile and high quality amps for a lot less money than can be expected from legendary company such as Marshall. For a Mesa, if you want to have an amp great for blues but also funk and r&b and rock and metal, you will need a rectifier, a lonestar, and a mark iv, and frankly, who the hell has that money other than john petrucci? Marshalls are amazing, and so are Mesa Boogies, but for someone who wants extreme versatility to do an abundance of styles like myself, great sound and quality craftsmanship for less than Mesa, you want one Marshall, not four Mesa Boogies. But if you want mega distortion and only mega distortion, get the Mesa Boogie head, and add a Marshall cab!POSTED: 12/11/2006 - 09:14 pm / quote |
JeffReigns
: I guess I'm emo, I always have reverb on, even on my distortion, damn, I think I'll go slit my wrists now...POSTED: 12/12/2006 - 12:30 am / quote |
GuitarJunkie
: jesus...the guy is a little ignorant but dont bash him for bashing marshalls cause then your just as dumb as he is...IF YOU READ THE DAMN THING HE SAID "The crap marshall is putting out LATELY" i dont know about you...but the mg's avt's and even jcm2000's dont at all compare to the 800's, 900's, plexis, and jtm models the use to have in production...so in that sense he is rightPOSTED: 12/12/2006 - 03:50 am / quote |
the.spine.surfs
: JeffReigns wrote:
I guess I'm emo, I always have reverb on, even on my distortion, damn, I think I'll go slit my wrists now... |
Ah hah hah. Stupid screamo hogging all the reverb...HEY, SAVE SOME FOR INDIE.POSTED: 12/12/2006 - 07:41 am / quote |
speedinc
: Satans_Shredder wrote:
I Love how he compares a Triple Mesa to a Dual Marshall...thats like apples to oranges, wwhat a jackass. I guess thats cause the Marshall TSL blows the Mesa Triple outta the water |
Yea right. TSL got less power, isn't handmade, and sounds "ok". Mesa is probably the best amp I've ever heard. The old marshall stuff was MUCH better than the TSL anyway (ie.. JTM, Plexi, and so on). But personally I still like the Mesa tone better!!!POSTED: 12/16/2006 - 10:09 am / quote |
1h81337
: i tried this amp last night high.
the reverb sucked me in and i felt like i was falling into a deeeeep hole.
this is a sweet amp.POSTED: 12/28/2006 - 05:44 pm / quote |
punksucks666
: well im just gonna say good on you for saving up that much money, in Australia, they cost like $5100, i badly want one, nice one guysPOSTED: 01/09/2007 - 04:42 am / quote |
E V H 5150
: Yeah, Van Halen, GNR, Bon Jovi, Quiet Riot, Steve Miller, Ozzy Osbourne, The Scorpions, they're all emo. I saw videos of some of their shows. Nobody was jumping. Nobody. Not even when Van Halen was playing Jump.POSTED: 01/21/2007 - 11:16 pm / quote |
Demonikk
: Jeez if you want reverb so much, go and buy a bloody reverb pedal! If you can afford the £3000-odd that the head and cab costs, I'm sure you can shell out less than £100 for a reverb pedal. Oh and about a tenner for an extra lead. And you can't really compare Marshalls to Mesas. They've got different target audiences and have different sounds. You can compare Mesas to Kranks, but that's about it. POSTED: 02/03/2007 - 03:18 pm / quote |
satellitesv03
: I agree that Mesa's and Marshall's are completely different amps. They each have their realms: Mesa covers the higher gain frequencies while Marshall can break up with lower gain very nicely.
For anyone who cares, try the Mesa Triple with EL-34s. Just don't forget the bias switch on the back. It's awesome. It might be the sound that both of you can agree on.
Plus, a Mesa Triple can become a Dual in a blink; just remove the two outer or inner power tubes. the 150W goes to 100W. Remove two more, you have 50W, or essentially, a Single Rectifier. This causes break up sooner.
Hope this helps.POSTED: 02/10/2007 - 07:07 pm / quote |
bono_b
: satellitesv03 wrote:
I agree that Mesa's and Marshall's are completely different amps. They each have their realms: Mesa covers the higher gain frequencies while Marshall can break up with lower gain very nicely.
For anyone who cares, try the Mesa Triple with EL-34s. Just don't forget the bias switch on the back. It's awesome. It might be the sound that both of you can agree on.
Plus, a Mesa Triple can become a Dual in a blink; just remove the two outer or inner power tubes. the 150W goes to 100W. Remove two more, you have 50W, or essentially, a Single Rectifier. This causes break up sooner.
Hope this helps. |
Although if you change the tube arrangement to get the dual and single amount of wattage it still doesn't change the fact that duals were handmade, tripples wearn't.POSTED: 02/25/2007 - 09:12 pm / quote |
harley10_5
: well these amps are wayyyyy too trebly or bassy...im not retarded..what i mean is theres no in between when you set the EQ on it no matter how you set it its either extremly bassy or extremly trebly...theres no in between. and it has way to much power for anybody...youll never use all of it live because if you know what youre doing, your amp will be mic'd up live and the volume wont be push pst probably 20-30%. dont buy this amp and waste your money, buy something without as much flash and half the power and spend the rest on guitar mods or pedals or something.POSTED: 03/07/2007 - 09:51 am / quote |
speedinc
: bono_b wrote:
satellitesv03 wrote:
I agree that Mesa's and Marshall's are completely different amps. They each have their realms: Mesa covers the higher gain frequencies while Marshall can break up with lower gain very nicely.
For anyone who cares, try the Mesa Triple with EL-34s. Just don't forget the bias switch on the back. It's awesome. It might be the sound that both of you can agree on.
Plus, a Mesa Triple can become a Dual in a blink; just remove the two outer or inner power tubes. the 150W goes to 100W. Remove two more, you have 50W, or essentially, a Single Rectifier. This causes break up sooner.
Hope this helps.
Although if you change the tube arrangement to get the dual and single amount of wattage it still doesn't change the fact that duals were handmade, tripples wearn't. | Triple's are Handmade!POSTED: 03/29/2007 - 04:31 am / quote |
AnxietyAngel
: F*ck You Guys, Randall Is Way Better Than MesaPOSTED: 05/15/2007 - 03:52 pm / quote |
speedinc
: AnxietyAngel wrote:
F*ck You Guys, Randall Is Way Better Than Mesa |
Yet, because many greats (like Metallica) have switched to Mesa's... I guess your right Randalls are better...
After all you've given soooo much evidence in you statement that proves your point. POSTED: 05/18/2007 - 10:39 am / quote |
AnxietyAngel
: speedinc for one thing randalls are made for pure heavy metalPOSTED: 06/04/2007 - 02:36 pm / quote |
AnxietyAngel
: Mesa Sound Like Theirs Too
Much Treble And Not Enough Bass, And Plus I've Seen A Few Randall Stacks in Their Studio, After All Dimebage darrel's Been Using Randall Amps For Most Of His Career And I'll Just Name A Few Other Band Who use Randall Amps okken, Lynch mob, Sevendust, AnthraxAnd Zakk Wylde Has Used Them For His First Few Black Label Society Albums!POSTED: 06/04/2007 - 02:49 pm / quote |
strike666
: Triple Rectifier - really shitPOSTED: 06/08/2007 - 09:47 am / quote |
hvymtl939
: How much are you gonna spend for one of these new?POSTED: 07/05/2007 - 01:54 am / quote |
dale-banez
: "My only comlaint is that it doesnt have reverb which is ok bc I dont play and emo shit or magic metal or w/e."
guess Slash is emo then...POSTED: 07/29/2007 - 09:05 pm / quote |
metal jello
: MESA>KRANK
MESA>RANDALL
MESA>PEAVEY
MESA>FENDER
MESA IS AWESOME!!!!!POSTED: 08/15/2007 - 03:33 pm / quote |
metaldier
: I saw a mates triple recto and another's dual, and the triple has 15 tubes whereas the dual, 5. Something like that lol. Fucking crazyPOSTED: 08/22/2007 - 08:46 am / quote |
stafford5150
: hi, most of you guys seem to know what you are talking about apart from the guy who wrote that really sh*t review, but im looking to get a mesa boogie dual or triple rectifier, what would you guys have said is the way to go? considering price/value for money. thanksPOSTED: 09/15/2007 - 07:03 pm / quote |
ryanph2421
: dual rec's are good but the triple is my fav.they're the shit...REAL TALKPOSTED: 09/20/2007 - 10:16 pm / quote |
LRZ3333
: Just get what you like dammit! Who cares what people think! It's all about YOUR SOUND right???? Your money, your taste, your decision. Try out amps and choose one that sounds good to you and is reliable. People talk too much sh*t these days! POSTED: 10/16/2007 - 11:54 pm / quote |
kurtshapedbox
: DareBear02 wrote:
[quoteok A) kranks are horrible... tey have thin solid state distortion.... ] |
Dude, I love metal, I play metal and you can't knock off an Amp that ONLY MAKES TUBES and was USED BY DIME BAG DARRELL...[/quote]
Man, personally, I think that Krank's are the least versatile amps i've ever played. They're made for getting good distortion for metal, but to me it does sound very very thin. I had one break down on me when i was simply trying it out at a guitar store. It was pathetic. Hell, look at the bands that use to endorse krank, Behemoth, Nevermore, and Arch Enemy. Behemoth never liked Krank in the first place and didnt even use them on The Apostasy (th one album that Krank endoresed them on. Instead they used Mesa Boogie Dual Rectifiers and Bogners. Nevermore has already moved on after one album to ENGL. And Arch Enemy already dropped em and moved on to Randall. The only person I've ever seen stick with a Krank was Dimebag, and though he was a good guitarist by all means, I personally wasn't a big fan of his tone, it just sounded awkward.POSTED: 11/18/2007 - 10:25 pm / quote |
deafening
: some people are putting this amp down because they dont need all that BONE CRUSHING, LIFE SHATTERING power...WTF? Just cause you don't need all of it doesn't make the amp any worse, it makes YOU worse for not needing it.:P no not really, but the amp's gain is perfect, the clean is somewhat lacking, but works for me 
i love this machinePOSTED: 12/05/2007 - 04:09 pm / quote |
DeathByStereo23
: metal jello wrote:
MESA>KRANK
MESA>RANDALL
MESA>PEAVEY
MESA>FENDER
MESA IS AWESOME!!!!! |
MESA>FENDER
MESAPOSTED: 02/24/2008 - 02:46 pm / quote |
DeathByStereo23
: **** to that the site doesn't allow me to complete the comment i thinkPOSTED: 02/24/2008 - 02:48 pm / quote |
metal jello
: What exactly are silicon diodes? Are they kinda like tubes you don't replace..... I've heard you can make this amp tube or non-tube, and you can bias for either British El34's or the safer 6l6"s.... But what are silicon diodes??? Someone help.POSTED: 06/08/2008 - 03:38 pm / quote |
HELLSHREDD
: Check any mesa out on U-tube & see for ur-self that they sound like crap.I have the new spidervalve Hd-100 & that has amazing tone compared to that over-rated , over powered, buzzy sound ya get from a Mesa& i mean any mesa ! I have not once seen someone get a wonderful tone from these junk piles , i even owned one & i took it back & now im happy , im a metal head & mesa suks bunk , dont waste ur money , go buy a line 6 & have half the loudness But amazing tone.POSTED: 06/23/2008 - 07:25 pm / quote |
Shadowrunner
: I played a Marshall at GC the other day. It was just horrible. The distortion sucked. The clean channel was OK. It made me wonder how anyone could ever try one out and want one. Now, I've never played a Mesa, but anything has to be better than that Marshall I played.POSTED: 07/12/2008 - 10:04 pm / quote |
deanplayer18
: dude if ur into tone then get a marshall that have that classic crunch and clean sure they dont run as much much gain but hey a simple distortion or od pedal works good to run more gain for u without killing ur tone while mesas are good for high gain as seen with many metal bands and a few blues artist like santana POSTED: 07/13/2008 - 07:07 pm / quote |
travd92
: in my opinion, EL34's suck ass. thats why most marshalls IMO don't have balls. i would definitely play the Kerry King Signature though. but mesa amps are the best in the world for me.POSTED: 08/10/2008 - 09:45 pm / quote |
racman92
: aidandude wrote:
why would you use a 150 watt tube amp as a practice amp? you cant get a good sond out of theese things unless you crank it. and wtf do you mean reverb is for emos? i should kill your wife |
Power Attenuator. These amps rock...and "emo s***", seriously?POSTED: 08/30/2008 - 09:46 am / quote |
metal jello
: Can this get a Black Stone Cherry type tone???POSTED: 09/27/2008 - 10:36 pm / quote |
|