
|
|
Blue October Overlooked For Grammy? |
| artist: blue october |
date: 02/05/2007 |
category: video news |
|
|
|
Blue October's latest album, Foiled, may have summed up their Grammy Award aspirations. Despite being hailed as the band's best work and their single "Hate Me" crossing over to the CHR charts, the band didn't receive one nomination for this weekend's Grammy Awards.
Vocalist Justin Furstenfeld said that he's beyond the point in caring what others think about his music.
Watch video: Blue October On Grammy Award Snub
"I'm kind of at the point in my life where I've been doing this so long I could care less, you know. I didn't... I make music for myself and for the audience and I don't really read that kind of stuff, you know what I mean? It's hard enough to stay focused in my own life much less hear somebody else's opinion on what they think about me."
In fact, Blue October will be at Minneapolis, Minnesota's First Avenue rocking the crowd as the Grammys are taking place in Los Angeles. The band recently partnered with MTV-U and The Jed Foundation to bring awareness to the problem of mental health in college students for the Half Of Us initiative. It's based on a recent report said that at one time or another at least half of all college students were so depressed they "couldn't function."
|
|
|
|
More Blue October news:
|
38 comments posted, 3 removed | this article is 93% spam-free |
vanceboy
: I personally don't think they really deserved a grammy, though I have nothing against em. Just, they're nothing special.POSTED: 02/05/2007 - 02:27 pm / quote |
Cied Shredder
: vanceboy wrote:
I personally don't think they really deserved a grammy, though I have nothing against em. Just, they're nothing special. |
QFT.POSTED: 02/05/2007 - 02:33 pm / quote |
Nole07
: i agree...i dont really like any of their stuff. POSTED: 02/05/2007 - 02:41 pm / quote |
wingedgopher
: Not that Grammys area good benchmark for talent but they really are not a very good band and therefore probably don't deserve the award.POSTED: 02/05/2007 - 02:51 pm / quote |
_TheWorst
: Haha, "Hate Me" was just another Pop Punk Ballad song. Absolutely nothing special about it. They definitely deserved to be ignored.POSTED: 02/05/2007 - 03:05 pm / quote |
Powerhouse
: Hundreds if not thousands of musicians are overlooked for Grammy awards every year. Blue October are pretty good, but Grammy worthy? Nah.POSTED: 02/05/2007 - 03:13 pm / quote |
BlindS!ght
: You can't deny that their talented, even if you don't like their music. It's not really my kind of music either, but like Furstenfeld said, he's making music for himself not so he can hear what other peoples opinions are.POSTED: 02/05/2007 - 03:15 pm / quote |
[NIN]_ROCK!
: I actually think they deserve the Grammy for the attitude they have. Their music is pretty good,IMO. Rock ON!POSTED: 02/05/2007 - 03:19 pm / quote |
pratt121
: They're good enough for the radio but probably not good enough to get a Grammy. You're going to have to do more to get a Grammy than write just another limp power ballad... Nickelback can tell you this (and yes, Nickelback and Blue October are placed in the same category... cheesy power ballads)POSTED: 02/05/2007 - 03:36 pm / quote |
jesjes21
: you know why they didnt get a grammy nom? cause ive already forgotten about them. oh and blindedangel, you have no idea what indie is, do you? if blue october is indie, then nickelback is hardcore.POSTED: 02/05/2007 - 03:58 pm / quote |
g8erfan1
: Nothing against Blue October, but the grammy's are bullshit anyway.POSTED: 02/05/2007 - 04:40 pm / quote |
whitebluesboy
: Blue October is a good band and all, but I'm pretty sure 572098457204 other bands weren't nominated either but we don't need a news article on it.POSTED: 02/05/2007 - 04:55 pm / quote |
ThrashMan981
: why is there so much blue october news on UG?POSTED: 02/05/2007 - 05:12 pm / quote |
Pennywise33
: i'm sorry but i hate this band. the vocalist (dunno his name) looks more metro than goth/depressed in their one music videoPOSTED: 02/05/2007 - 05:13 pm / quote |
anybodyhome
: i can see y they were overlooked, just kidding they are alright
POSTED: 02/05/2007 - 05:33 pm / quote |
epiphonedemon
: I think they deserve an award more that some of the lame ass wanna be ROCK STARS out there that will be crowned and need to be canned.POSTED: 02/05/2007 - 06:10 pm / quote |
RedHotFan182
: the grammys are not getting mad over. obviously the voters dont know anything about music considering jethro tull beat metallica for the first metal award POSTED: 02/05/2007 - 06:24 pm / quote |
m
: Checkycheesed.POSTED: 02/05/2007 - 07:52 pm / quote |
EOTM
: Winning a grammy is like being elected vice president. Whats the point? O and i have 2 words: Milli VinilliPOSTED: 02/05/2007 - 08:18 pm / quote |
JesusOfSbrbia
: The Grammys are a load of bullcrap. No, Blue October doesn't deserve one, because they sound exactly like all the other modern rock bands who ALSO don't deserve any.POSTED: 02/05/2007 - 08:33 pm / quote |
Kevin97220
: I really don't like them either
POSTED: 02/05/2007 - 09:25 pm / quote |
misirlou
: that's really strange to me. that song is exactly the kind of safe, white bread bullsh*t that the grammys usually drool over. could it be that grammy voters are actually starting to pay attention to quality? in any case, that song is truly garbage.POSTED: 02/05/2007 - 09:35 pm / quote |
EMT911
: RedHotFan182 wrote:
the grammys are not getting mad over. obviously the voters dont know anything about music considering jethro tull beat metallica for the first metal award |
JT over Metallica is when I stopped lending any ounce of credibility to the "Grammy's"; besides, who the heck is Blue October anyway?POSTED: 02/05/2007 - 11:09 pm / quote |
lwnovember
: what?? are we to believe that this is comparable on the stage of Metallica being over looked on the grammysPOSTED: 02/05/2007 - 11:35 pm / quote |
Crunchy Blues
: | you know why they didnt get a grammy nom? cause ive already forgotten about them. oh and blindedangel, you have no idea what indie is, do you? if blue october is indie, then nickelback is hardcore. |
simply amazingPOSTED: 02/06/2007 - 12:03 am / quote |
DanSumthing
: This article must be a joke.
Blue October's songwriting makes me laugh. It's really bad.POSTED: 02/06/2007 - 12:21 am / quote |
Partyboy2k05
: I actually do like blue october, just none of the stuff on the radio. I liked everything else on the foiled album. The singles weren't amazing IMO, but they were catchy. So I'll just leave it at that, grammmy's...no, i don't think they should be nominated because the grammy's should be for the guys that have the best songs of the year...and frankly there's a hell of a lot of songs made every year. POSTED: 02/06/2007 - 01:57 am / quote |
m
: Checked...Québec StylePOSTED: 02/06/2007 - 08:18 am / quote |
Guitar_Dude777
: I personally think that they dont deserve onePOSTED: 02/06/2007 - 08:51 am / quote |
megadethirish
: Dont 4get, Lamb of God have been nominated 4 a grammy, so the grammys do have sum bit of taste! POSTED: 02/06/2007 - 11:15 am / quote |
BassNewbie
: Grammys are a joke, its the same 5 bands every yearPOSTED: 02/06/2007 - 11:21 am / quote |
"Tele" Steve
: It's actually not their best work in my opinion. POSTED: 02/06/2007 - 12:40 pm / quote |
pen15
: Milli Vanilli were ahead of their time, think about it. As for Blue October, eeek, my ears.POSTED: 02/06/2007 - 04:18 pm / quote |
Hooyahman
: I know why they didn't get a Grammy nod...cuz they're not goodPOSTED: 02/07/2007 - 12:11 am / quote |
|
|
|
|
|